linux-kernel - Re: shouldn't LVM support be selected by default?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707030913380.21919@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 3 Jul 2007 09:13:54 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To:	Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: shouldn't LVM support be selected by default?

On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Bodo Eggert wrote:

> Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...dspring.com> wrote:
>
> >   just built a new kernel and didn't notice that support for LVM
> > wasn't selected by default for x86.  given what i thought was fairly
> > widespread use of LVM2, wouldn't it make sense to have this option as
> > part of the default config?
>
> If you don't know about LVM, you don't need it. Do you?

well, ok, i can go with that.  thanks.

rday
-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/