linux-kernel - Re: shouldn't LVM support be selected by default?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070706155312.GB12786@agk.fab.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:53:12 +0100
From:	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
Cc:	Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: shouldn't LVM support be selected by default?

On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:13:54AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> > If you don't know about LVM, you don't need it. Do you?
> well, ok, i can go with that.  thanks.
 
But we should probably drop EXPERIMENTAL now from more of the targets.

Alasdair
-- 
agk@...hat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/