[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0707031255420.3936-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:57:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM
pathway
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:03:33PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >
> > > Suspend to RAM on a machine with / on a fuse filesystem turns out to be
> > > a screaming nightmare - either the suspend fails because syslog (for
> > > instance) can't be frozen, or the machine deadlocks for some other
> > > reason I haven't tracked down. We could "fix" fuse, or alternatively we
> > > could do what we do for suspend to RAM on other platforms (PPC and APM)
> > > and just not use the freezer.
> >
> > Quite apart from the sync() matter, _any_ synchronous call to a FUSE
> > filesystem during STR will cause trouble. Even if the user task
> > implementing the filesystem isn't frozen, when it tries to carry out
> > some I/O to a suspended device it will either:
> >
> > block until the system wakes up, or
>
> For the suspend to RAM case, that sounds absolutely fine.
It's not so good when your suspend process has to wait for the call to
complete!
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists