| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0707031441480.9434@woody.linux-foundation.org> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:42:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Bj?rn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de> cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@....hp.com> Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Bj?rn Steinbrink wrote: > On 2007.07.03 18:45:24 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Subject : OProfile issues > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/12/207 > > Submitter : Stephane Eranian <eranian@....hp.com> > > Handled-By : Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de> > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/12/392 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/20/275 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/20/276 > > Status : patches were suggested > > Andi said that one of the regression fixes wasn't critical for .22 and > that he wants to do a stopgap for the other regression (my patch > sucked), reverting the code to the .21 version. So you can drop the > patches and/or me here. Can you say which patch should be reverted. This thing really shouldn't have gone on this long, I would have hopef we had the oprofile thing sorted out already.. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists