linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070703221210.GA29959@atjola.homenet>
Date:	Wed, 4 Jul 2007 00:12:10 +0200
From:	Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@....hp.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc7: known regressions with patches

On 2007.07.03 14:42:25 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Bj?rn Steinbrink wrote:
> > Andi said that one of the regression fixes wasn't critical for .22 and
> > that he wants to do a stopgap for the other regression (my patch
> > sucked), reverting the code to the .21 version. So you can drop the
> > patches and/or me here.
> 
> Can you say which patch should be reverted. This thing really shouldn't 
> have gone on this long, I would have hopef we had the oprofile thing 
> sorted out already..

That would be commit 09198e68501a7e34737cd9264d266f42429abcdc, for which
there are already a few fixes in your tree. Andi, did you intent to
fully revert that, or just certain parts of it?

Björn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/