linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: make SMP locks handling interact properly with CONFIG_DEBUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <468BCE7F.107@goop.org>
Date:	Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:44:47 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC:	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...-64.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make SMP locks handling interact properly with CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA
 (2nd try)

Andi Kleen wrote:
> Not if the patching happens early enough at boot. That's true for Xen
> and lguest, but I'm not sure about VMI

paravirt_ops patching happens at the same time as all other patching, 
via check_bugs().  So its the same regardless of backend, and quite late.

    J

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/