linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: make SMP locks handling interact properly with CONFIG_DEBUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070704175142.GA3795@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 4 Jul 2007 13:51:42 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...-64.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make SMP locks handling interact properly with
	CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA (2nd try)

On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 08:41:39AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
 
 > I'd already posted a patch to remove smp alternatives.  I thought it had 
 > been merged already, but I guess it's in Andi's queue.

What was the rationale behind that?  Given many distros have now
moved to shipping just an SMP kernel, this seems like a step backwards?

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/