[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sl83fi60.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:01:27 +0100
From: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
Cc: List util-linux-ng <util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] util-linux-ng 2.13-rc1
On 4 Jul 2007, DervishD stated:
> Anyway, if you don't like mobs or you just don't want to try it,
> that's fine, but please don't use autotools, it doesn't make much sense
> for a linux only project, since you will be using only the "directory
> choosing" part of autotools. Maybe a hand made script will help (and I
Oh, yeah, great, another hand-rolled build system. That's *juwt* what
those of us who have autotools working well (with config.site's that
do all we need and then some) are looking forward to.
There are advantages to standardization, you know. A *lot* of
autobuilders know how to make autoconf-generated configure scripts jump
through hoops. I was downright *happy* when util-linux was
autoconfiscated: I could ditch the code to handle automatic
configuration of yet another one-package hand-rolled build system.
--
`... in the sense that dragons logically follow evolution so they would
be able to wield metal.' --- Kenneth Eng's colourless green ideas sleep
furiously
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists