[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070705084806.GB3476@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:48:06 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Sattler <tsattler@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debug workqueue flushing deadlocks with lockdep
* Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
> This patch adds a fake lock to each workqueue in order to debug things
> where you have something like
>
> my_function() -> lock(); ...; flush_workqueue(); ...
> vs
> run_workqueue() -> my_work() -> ...; lock(); ...
>
> which can obviously deadlock if my_work is scheduled when my_function()
> is invoked (but hasn't locked yet.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
i'm still impressed by the elegancy of your idea :)
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
btw., small patch format comment: it would be useful (in the future) to
send such combined patches as:
[patch 0/2] general description
[patch 1/2] first patch
[patch 2/2] second patch
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists