linux-kernel - Re: [patch 10/10] Scheduler profiling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <468EBEB2.4070605@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:14:10 -0400
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 10/10] Scheduler profiling - Use immediate values

On 07/06/2007 07:44 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I think the optimization is a good idea, although i dislike it
> that it is complicated for the dynamic markers. If it was just
> static it would be much simpler.
> 

Another thing to consider is that there might be hundreds of these
probes/tracepoints active in an instrumented kernel. The overhead
adds up fast, so the gain may be worth all the pain.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/