[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <468DD6A5.4020705@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 22:44:05 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Dan Kegel <dank@...el.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Robert Walsh <rjwalsh@...ables.org>
Subject: Re: Valgrinding the kernel?
Dan Kegel wrote:
> It'd be nice to see if Valgrind could catch uninitialized
> references in the kernel, if only to see if Coverity is
> missing anything that happens in practice.
>
> Back in December 2002, Valgrind started to run UML:
> http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/diary.html
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=104035199923121&w=2
> but it wasn't quite usable, and it seems broken since then.
> The last note I could find about this was from Jeff In July 2005:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=112273702329952&w=2
>
> Has there been any motion since then?
Not that I know of. I think all the pieces are in place now. The
original problem was that Valgrind didn't deal with clone and didn't
have accurate signal support. I fixed that. Then the problem was
dealing with the densely packed small kernel stacks. Valgrind now has a
way of registering stack regions, so that it can distinguish between a
stack switch and a normal function call.
So, I think all it needs now is to scatter some valgrind client requests
around the kernel and give it a spin. See, simple ;)
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists