[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707061553.51036.nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:53:50 +1000
From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
To: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
Hi Kyle.
On Friday 06 July 2007 15:01:48 Kyle Moffett wrote:
> On Jul 06, 2007, at 00:03:15, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > The kind of thing Linus was talking about would limit you (as
> > swsusp and uswsusp do now) to only half the amount of memory.
>
> How so? Suppose hibernate is implemented like this:
You're not talking about the same thing Linus was suggesting. He was just
wanting a result = sys_snapshot() sort of call. That would limit us to half
the amount of memory.
I've looked over what you've written below and want to consider it in detail.
Right now though, I don't have the time. I'll try to get back to you
promptly.
Nigel
--
See http://www.tuxonice.net for Howtos, FAQs, mailing
lists, wiki and bugzilla info.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists