linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.22-rc6(mm1) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 8 Jul 2007 19:51:18 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc6(mm1) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference - git-bisect result

On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 11:38:20AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I do think that it would be even nicer to just have a function that fills 
> in the "struct nameidata" from the dfd. I think we should be able to: the 
> "struct file" really does have the "f_path" thing with both dentry and mnt 
> information, and that would clean up that whole ugly "filepointer-vs-nd" 
> thing a lot.
> 
> That would be an "Al cleanup", though. What do you think, Al?

I think that we need to go the other way round - gather nameidata
->nd and ->dentry into struct path and pass pointer to that instead...

But that's .23-rc1 fodder, if not .23-rc2 one (we might want to
do -rc2 with just that, to avoid conflicts with pending patches).
Definitely not for .22-final.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/