| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <9a8748490707081153k2f2e858bv2921f5cf763615f4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 20:53:03 +0200 From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com> To: "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...sta.de> Cc: "Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@...il.com>, akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Some love to default profiler On 08/07/07, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 01:50:27AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > On 04/07/07, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote: > >> 1) Drop __KERNEL__ out of profile.h. It contains only internal kernel > >> stuff and > >> not in exported headers list > > > > Even if it's not in the list of exported headers, does it really hurt > > to retain that extra safeguard? > >... > > Safeguard for what? > Well, for userspace code that tries to include the file. I know nobody should, but somebody still might. At least that was my thought when I made that comment. > And it has to be consistent, and current policy is to not have > #ifdef __KERNEL__'s in all not to userspace exported headers. > Ok, in that case it should go away. -- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists