linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707092044520.2887@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jul 2007 20:46:20 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled ACPI_PROCFS removal


On Jul 9 2007 17:45, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>> This patch contains the scheduled removal of the ACPI procfs interface.
>
>What part of "we do not gratuitously break user space interfaces" is so
>hard for people to understand.

Generally I am with you on that, but if everyone keeps on using /proc --
and I do[*] -- we will never get rid of it.


[*] Does someone have an alternative for /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/{state,info}?

Thanks,
	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/