linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070709185501.GA32724@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:55:02 +0100
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, lenb@...nel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled ACPI_PROCFS removal

On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 08:46:20PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

> Generally I am with you on that, but if everyone keeps on using /proc --
> and I do[*] -- we will never get rid of it.
> 
> 
> [*] Does someone have an alternative for /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/{state,info}?

The battery class work will provide one in the long run, but it's not 
mainline yet.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/