[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4691C08A.90707@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:58:50 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>
CC: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Hibernation Redesign
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
> Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> writes:
>>Yes, I have a rough idea about how page reclaim works. But I just
>>mean it would not be trivial to load the new kernel into physically
>>discontiguous memory. Possible of course, but I don't think kexec or
>>the setup code could quite cope ATM.
>
>
> It would indeed be a pain for the new kernel to be loaded and have to
> use discontiguous memory. The trick is, though, that this is not
> necessary. Immediately before jumping to the new kernel, the first X
> bytes (where X is the amount of memory the new kernel will get,
> typically 16MB or 64MB) of physical memory are backed up into the
> arbitrary discontiguous pages that are made available. This will not
> take very long, because copying even 64MB of memory is extremely fast.
> Then the new kernel is free to use the first X bytes of contiguous
> physical memory. Problem solved.
Ah, that sounds like it would be the right way to go. Good thinking.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists