linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.22 released

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070709050050.GC943@1wt.eu>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jul 2007 07:00:51 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.22 released

On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 04:52:52PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Anybody? Should I make just the shortlogs available instead (I don't save 
> those, but I post those for the later -rc's - usually the -rc1 and -rc2's 
> are too big for the mailing list, but they are still a lot smaller and 
> more readable than the *full* logs are)?
> 
> Or do people really want the full logs, and don't use git?

The changelogs would be more useful if they were indexed by google, but
it seems they aren't (maybe too big, since 2.4 and 2.6.16 changelogs are
indexed ?). At least having the shortlog available would be a minimum,
provided that we try to keep the most possible descriptive subjects.
This also means being more transparent about security fixes.

Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/