[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070710101558.cea7aab1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:15:58 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Amit Arora <aarora@...ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch (was:
re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 07:52:51 -0400 Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 01:31:52AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Merge
> >
> > fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch
>
> Andrew,
>
> Could you replace the comment/header section of
> fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch with the
> following (attached below) ? This is from the ext4 patches, where
> Amit had cleaned up description, which will make for a cleaner and
> easier to understand submission into the git tree.
There were issues with the x86 patch, the s390 patch was wrong and Tony
wants the the ia64 patch to use a different syscall number.
So I dropped everything. Let's start again from scratch. I'd suggest that
for now we go with just an i386/x86_64 implementation, let the arch
maintainers wire things up when that has settled down.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists