linux-kernel - Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070710102716.2fcae91c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:27:16 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Amit Arora <aarora@...ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate

On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:45:03 -0400 Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 02:22:13AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:07:37 +0200 Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > > We reserved a different syscall number than the one that is used right now
> > > in the patch. Please drop this patch... Martin or I will wire up the syscall
> > > as soon as the x86 variant is merged. Everything else just causes trouble and
> > > confusion.
> > 
> > OK, I dropped all the fallocate patches.
> 
> Andrew, I want to clarify who is going to push the fallocate patches.
> I can either push them to Linus as part of the ext4 patch set, or we
> can wait for you to push them.  I thought since you had them in -mm
> and we were going to wait you to push them (and presume that this was
> going to happen soon).

How about you send them?  The syscall numbers might need to be changed
based upon when/whether the revoke patches get merged.

> Alternatively I can push them directly to Linus along with other ext4
> patches.

I note that nobody really bothered reviewing all those ext4 patches.

Do you feel that they have been adequately reviewed?  I don't.  I guess I
know what I'll be doing today :(

>  We can drop the s390 patch if Martin or Heiko wants to wire
> it up themselves.

ia64 needs changing too.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/