linux-kernel - Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070710183912.GB15345@amitarora.in.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:09:12 +0530
From:	"Amit K. Arora" <aarora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate

On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 08:05:31PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > Alternatively I can push them directly to Linus along with other ext4
> > patches.  We can drop the s390 patch if Martin or Heiko wants to wire
> > it up themselves.
> 
> Yes, please drop the s390 patch. In general it seems to be better if only
> one architecture gets a syscall wired up initially and let other arches
> follow later.
> 
> Just wondering if the x86_64 compat syscall gets ever fixed? I think
> I mentioned already three or four times to Amit that it is broken.
> Or is it that nobody cares? Dunno..

Last time it was brought up was when TAKE5 of the patchset was posted
and I had planned to fix this in the TAKE6 - which didn't happen since
there was no final descision on the mode flags.
Anyhow, the x86_64 compat syscall has already been fixed in the ext4
patch queue.
I will repost all the patches rebased on 2.6.22 (as they are in the
ext4 patch queue), since these have already been dropped from -mm.
 
> In addition there used to be a somewhat inofficial rule that new syscalls
> have to come with a test program, so people can easily test if they wired
> up the syscall correctly.

Ok. Will work on a small testcase and post it soon.

--
Regards,
Amit Arora
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/