| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20070710115319.0bdaff34.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:53:19 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com> Cc: vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org Subject: Re: containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:34:38 -0700 "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com> wrote: > Andrew, how about we merge enough of the container framework to > support CFS? Bits we could leave out for now include container_clone() > support and the nsproxy subsystem, fork/exit callback hooks, and > possibly leave cpusets alone for now (which would also mean we could > skip the automatic release-agent stuff). I'm in Tokyo for the Linux > Foundation Japan symposium right now, but I should be able to get the > new patchset to you for Friday afternoon. mm.. Given that you propose leaving bits out for the 2.6.23 merge, and that changes are still pending and that nothing will _use_ the framework in 2.6.23 I'd be inclined to err on the side of caution and hold it all back from 2.6.23. This has the advantage that the merge will happen after the kernel-summit containers discussion which I suspect will be an important point in the life of this project... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists