linux-kernel - Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch (was: re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070710190735.GF27033@thunk.org>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:07:35 -0400
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Amit Arora <aarora@...ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch (was: re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)

On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:15:58AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> So I dropped everything.  Let's start again from scratch.  I'd suggest that
> for now we go with just an i386/x86_64 implementation, let the arch
> maintainers wire things up when that has settled down.

Ok, so no objections if we push the i386/x86_64 implementation (only),
plus the ext4 support to Linus?

						- Ted


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/