[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070710123108.e0f6e9b6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:31:08 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Amit Arora <aarora@...ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch (was:
re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:07:35 -0400
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:15:58AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > So I dropped everything. Let's start again from scratch. I'd suggest that
> > for now we go with just an i386/x86_64 implementation, let the arch
> > maintainers wire things up when that has settled down.
>
> Ok, so no objections if we push the i386/x86_64 implementation (only),
> plus the ext4 support to Linus?
>
Sounds like a plan.
I haven't seriously looked at ext4 code in many months. When I did I found
the changes to be quite incomprehensible, very, very poorly commented and
with quite a lot of odd-looking things about which I asked but got, iirc,
no useful reply.
Hopefully it got better.
Which patches are you proposing merging into 2.6.23?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists