linux-kernel - Re: containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:19:58 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	menage@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)

* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> The other alternative is to hook up group scheduler with user-id's 
> (again only for 2.6.23).

could you just try this and send an as simple patch as possible? This is 
actually something that non-container people would be interested in as 
well. (btw., if this goes into 2.6.23 then we cannot possibly turn it 
off in 2.6.24, so it must be sane - but per UID task groups are 
certainly sane, the only question is how to configure the per-UID weight 
after bootup. [the default after-bootup should be something along the 
lines of 'same weight for all users, a bit more for root'.]) This would 
make it possible for users to test that thing. (it would also help 
X-heavy workloads.)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/