linux-kernel - Re: testcases, was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070711103652.58230@gmx.net>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:36:52 +0200
From:	"Michael Kerrisk" <michael.kerrisk@....net>
To:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, hch@...radead.org
Cc:	schwidefsky@...ibm.com, aarora@...ibm.com, ak@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: testcases, was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate


> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:41:19AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> >>I'd support an ununofficial rule that submitters of new syscalls also
> >> raise a patch against LTP, come to that...
> > 
> > 
> > s/ununofficial//, please.  And extend this to every new kernel interface
> > that's not bound to a specific piece of hardware.
> 
> Agree, and cc manpages maintainer too? (preferably write most
> of the manpage body as well, IMO).

Yes, please.  Docs written by, or with input from, the implementer
provide one of the few ways for everyone else to spot differences
between implementation and intention.
-- 
Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten 
Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/