[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1I8Ze4-0008OM-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:42:08 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: rjw@...k.pl
CC: a1426z@...ab.com, jeremy@...p.org, jbms@....edu, pavel@....cz,
nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Hibernation Redesign
> > > Yes, I suppose. You're certain the old kernel's devices are completely
> > > quiescent at that point?
> >
> > That's exactly the problem; trying to save a state from within the
> > kernel would probably necessitate a freezer hack, which we are
> > trying so dearly to avoid.
>
> Well, I don't think that avoiding the freezer whatever it takes
> would be a good idea. There needs to be some balance. ;-)
Well, it takes some extra locking in the drivers. Which is needed
_anyway_ if we want to have a working s2ram without the freezer.
With the kexec approach, I don't see any extra requirements from the
kernel to be able to drop the freezer.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists