| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070711215412.GZ4306@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:54:12 -0700 From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org> Subject: Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 * Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:16:38 +0200, Andi Kleen said: > (Note - I'm just a usually-confused crash test dummy here...) > > > Well I spent a lot of time making the x86-64 timing code work > > well on a variety of machines; working around a wide variety > > of hardware and platform bugs. I obviously don't agree on your description > > of its maintenance state. > > I'm seeing a bit of a disconnect here. If you spent all that time making it > work, how come the guys who developed the patch are saying you didn't provide > any feedback about the patchset? I think Andi's referring to the existing x86_64 code, which gets replaced by the patchset in question. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists