[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070712172310.4d662e1f@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:23:10 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Yinghai.Lu@....COM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, rientjes@...gle.com,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] try parent numa_node at first before using default
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:30:28 +0200,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> So, since figuring the correct DMA device out is done by drivers
> themselves, they usually can figure out the correct NUMA node as well.
> The only precondition is that each DMA device has the correct NUMA node
> set. This is the job of subsystems like PCI, but it may be reasonable
> to have simple and broadly applicable helpers for this in the driver core.
>
> So, _is_ the dev->numa_node = dev->parent.numa_node assumption, if
> implemented in device_add() and device_move(), as simple and as broadly
> applicable as we want driver core's API to be? Perhaps yes.
If making the general assumption that the device will inherit the
numa_node through its parent(s) from the responsible DMA device is
reasonable, then device_move() should certainly update the numa_node
from the new parent. (For special cases, the caller could still call
set_dev_node() itself.)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists