linux-kernel - Re: [EXT4 set 5][PATCH 1/1] expand inode i_extra_isize to support features in larger inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070713121259.20066d5b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:12:59 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	cmm@...ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT4 set 5][PATCH 1/1] expand inode i_extra_isize to support
 features in larger inode

On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:33:41 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 02:05 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > Except lockdep doesn't know about journal_start(), which has ranking
> > requirements similar to a semaphore.  
> 
> Something like so?

Looks OK.

> Or can journal_stop() be done by a different task than the one that did
> journal_start()? - in which case nothing much can be done :-/

Yeah, journal_start() and journal_stop() are well-behaved.
 
> This seems to boot... albeit I did not push it hard.

I fear the consequences of this change :(

Oh well, please keep it alive, maybe beat on it a bit, resend it
later on?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/