[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4697C980.1040902@zh-kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:50:40 +0800
From: TripleX Chung <triplex@...kernel.org>
To: trivial@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Ask for help, about the trivial patches.
I am working on the chinese translated version of
Documentation/SubmittingPatches and get some problem about the "Trivial
patches".I can not understand what "Trivial patches" exactly means.The
documentation said:
Trivial patches must qualify for one of the following rules:
Spelling fixes in documentation
//Understand
Spelling fixes which could break grep(1)
//Is there any wrong spelling won't break grep(1)?
Warning fixes (cluttering with useless warnings is bad)
//Understand
Compilation fixes (only if they are actually correct)
//Understand
Runtime fixes (only if they actually fix things)
//What kind of runtime fixes? Could anyone give some examples?
Removing use of deprecated functions/macros (eg. check_region)
//Understand
Contact detail and documentation fixes
//Means Contact detail fixes and documentation fixes, right?
Are all the documentation fixes "trivial"?
Non-portable code replaced by portable code (even in arch-specific,
since people copy, as long as it's trivial)
//Do not understand the words in the brackets.
Any fix by the author/maintainer of the file (ie. patch monkey
in re-transmission mode)
//It means if I am the author of a file, when I modify the file, the
patch is trivial, right?
Please give me some advice. Thanks in advance.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists