[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4697FB6D.9060700@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:23:41 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
CC: Etienne Lorrain <etienne_lorrain@...oo.fr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C - revised
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> - The VGA recalc has the same bug as the assembly version where a VGA write protected
>> register is written (Overflow register) without setting the enable bit (see VGA docs).
I dug into this, and it turns out you're incorrect. Both the assembly
code and the C code are, in fact, 100% correct:
The only instance of writing the vertical overflow register is this code
in vga_set_480_scanlines():
out_idx(0x0c, crtc, 0x11); /* Vertical sync end, unlock CR0-7 */
out_idx(0x0b, crtc, 0x06); /* Vertical total */
out_idx(0x3e, crtc, 0x07); /* Vertical overflow */
out_idx(0xea, crtc, 0x10); /* Vertical sync start */
out_idx(end, crtc, 0x12); /* Vertical display end */
out_idx(0xe7, crtc, 0x15); /* Vertical blank start */
out_idx(0x04, crtc, 0x16); /* Vertical blank end */
Register 0x11 has the Protect (not enable!) bit in it, it is bit 7. As
you can see, it is cleared (meaning writable) at the beginning of this
sequence, and the fact that it's being done is even documented.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists