[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707162304330.1817@scrub.home>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:25:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, James Bruce <bruce@...rew.cmu.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > It's nice that these artifacts are gone, but that still doesn't explain
> > why this ratio had to be increase that much from around 1:10 to 1:69.
>
> More dynamic range is better? If you actually want a task to get 20x
> the CPU time of another, the older scheduler doesn't really allow it.
You can already have that, the complete range level from 19 to -20 was
about 1:80.
There is also something like too much range, I tried it with top at 19 and
as soon as something runs at -20 it's practically dead, because it gets
now only 1/5900 of cpu time.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists