[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707162351030.1817@scrub.home>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:13:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, James Bruce <bruce@...rew.cmu.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> and note that even on the old scheduler, nice-0 was "3200% more
> powerful" than nice +19 (with CONFIG_HZ=300),
How did you get that value? At any HZ the ratio should be around 1:10
(+- rounding error).
> in fact i like it that nice -20 has a slightly bigger punch than it used
> to have before:
"Slightly bigger"??? You're joking, right?
Especially the user levels are doing something completely different now,
which may break user expectation. While the user couldn't expect anything
precise, it's still a big difference whether a process at nice 5 gets 75%
of the time or only 30%.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists