[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070716222909.GA30906@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:29:09 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, James Bruce <bruce@...rew.cmu.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
* Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > and note that even on the old scheduler, nice-0 was "3200% more
> > powerful" than nice +19 (with CONFIG_HZ=300),
>
> How did you get that value? At any HZ the ratio should be around 1:10
> (+- rounding error).
you are wrong again. I sent you the numbers earlier today already:
| PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
| 2332 mingo 25 0 1580 248 196 R 95.1 0.0 0:11.84 loop
| 2335 mingo 39 19 1576 244 196 R 3.1 0.0 0:00.39 loop
3.1% is 3067% more than 95.1%, and the ratio is 1:30.67. You again deny
above that this is the case, and there's nothing i can do about your
denial of facts - that is your own private problem.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists