[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <469C177A.3080002@garzik.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:12:26 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: block/bsg.c
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Yup, but the concern (from Al, iirc) was that someone could change the code
> later on, add a new bug and have that bug hidden by the unneeded
> initialisation.
True.
That's why #gccbug went the safe route, took the cost of extra
instructions, and initialized it to zero.
> uninitialized_var() has the advantage that it generates no code, whereas "=
> 0" often adds instructions. Plus of course it is self-documenting, greppable-for
> and centrally alterable.
Agreed.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists