[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1184684443.12353.435.camel@chaos>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:00:43 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [patch-mm 14/33] x86_64: Consolidate tsc calibration
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 14:51 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sunday 15 July 2007 18:10:55 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Move the TSC calibration code to tsc.c. Reimplement it so the
> > pm timer can be used as a reference as well.
>
> Why is the pm timer better than the PIT for this?
>
> I've had mixed success with the pmtimer too.
I had more consistent results on i386 with pmtimer than with the PIT
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm/include/asm-i386/tsc.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm.orig/include/asm-i386/tsc.h 2007-07-15 17:26:45.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm/include/asm-i386/tsc.h 2007-07-15 17:34:42.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -71,4 +71,8 @@ extern void init_tsc_clocksource(void);
> > extern void check_tsc_sync_source(int cpu);
> > extern void check_tsc_sync_target(void);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > +extern void tsc_calibrate(void);
> > +#endif
>
> The ifdef shouldn't be needed?
Yep. It can go.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists