linux-kernel - Re: uninline check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707171338290.27353@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
cc:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>, jdike@...aya.com,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: uninline check_signature()



On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 
> OR I'll have to disable HAS_IOMEM on m68k, and invent a new Kconfig
> symbol for lots of other stuff that currently depends on HAS_IOMEM...

Well, as far as I'm concerned, you could also make all drivers that 
actually need "check_signature()" do a Kconfig level

	select CHECK_SIGNATURE

along with a

	config CHECK_SIGNATURE
		bool
		default n

in lib/Kconfig, and thus make it totally independent of any hw/bus 
features at all, and simply depend on whether it is needed or not. I'd be 
ok with that, and it's certainly "correct" too.

Hmm?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/