[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707180844330.23024@anakin>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 08:45:05 +0200 (CEST)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>, jdike@...aya.com,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: uninline check_signature()
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > OR I'll have to disable HAS_IOMEM on m68k, and invent a new Kconfig
> > symbol for lots of other stuff that currently depends on HAS_IOMEM...
>
> Well, as far as I'm concerned, you could also make all drivers that
> actually need "check_signature()" do a Kconfig level
>
> select CHECK_SIGNATURE
>
> along with a
>
> config CHECK_SIGNATURE
> bool
> default n
>
> in lib/Kconfig, and thus make it totally independent of any hw/bus
> features at all, and simply depend on whether it is needed or not. I'd be
> ok with that, and it's certainly "correct" too.
>
> Hmm?
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> ;-)
(will cook a patch when I find a timeslot)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists