[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070718111016.GA18716@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:10:17 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: david@...g.hm
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Jim Crilly <jim@....dont.jablowme.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>,
Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
Subject: Re: Hibernation considerations
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 08:54:24PM -0700, david@...g.hm wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 08:19:32AM -0700, david@...g.hm wrote:
> >>On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >>>Powering off rather than using S4 means you lose most wakeup device
> >>>support. That would be a functional regression compared to the current
> >>>code.
> >>
> >>only if the kexec isn't able to initialize those devices.
> >
> >If you aren't using ACPI, you probably don't know how to.
>
> the current kexec patch to allow you to move back to the original kernel
> requires ACPI be disabled to work.
Which means it isn't putting the hardware into S4, which means that you
don't get the platform wakeup events.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists