lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070719193658.GA24942@Krystal>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:36:58 -0400
From:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To:	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>,
	Karim Yaghmour <karim@...rsys.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix a use after free bug in kernel->userspace relay file support

* Jesper Juhl (jesper.juhl@...il.com) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Coverity spotted what looks like a real possible case of using a 
> variable after it has been freed.
> The problem is in kernel/relay.c::relay_open_buf()
> 
> If the code hits "goto free_buf;" it ends up in this code :
> 
>   free_buf:
>     	relay_destroy_buf(buf);	<--- calls kfree() on 'buf'.
>   free_name:
>    	kfree(tmpname);
>   end:
>   	return buf;		<-- use after free of 'buf'.
> 
> I read through the callers and they all handle a NULL return 
> from this function as an error (and hitting the 'free_buf' label 
> only happens on failure to chan->cb->create_buf_file(), so that 
> looks like a clear error to me). 
> 
> The patch simply sets 'buf' to NULL after the call to 
> relay_destroy_buf(buf); - as far as I can see that should take 
> care of the problem.
> 
> The patch also corrects a reference to a documentation file while 
> I was at it.
> 
> Warning: I don't know this code at all and I've only read through 
> it quickly to try and work out what to do here, so I'd really 
> apreciate it if someone who actually knows how this code should 
> behave could ACK or NACK the patch before it gets merged anywhere 
> since I did this pretty blind.
> 
> Patch has been compile tested only.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>

Yes, the fix seems good. Thanks.

Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>

> ---
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/relay.c b/kernel/relay.c
> index a615a8f..c55e399 100644
> --- a/kernel/relay.c
> +++ b/kernel/relay.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  /*
>   * Public API and common code for kernel->userspace relay file support.
>   *
> - * See Documentation/filesystems/relayfs.txt for an overview of relayfs.
> + * See Documentation/filesystems/relay.txt for an overview.
>   *
>   * Copyright (C) 2002-2005 - Tom Zanussi (zanussi@...ibm.com), IBM Corp
>   * Copyright (C) 1999-2005 - Karim Yaghmour (karim@...rsys.com)
> @@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ static struct rchan_buf *relay_open_buf(struct rchan *chan, unsigned int cpu)
>  
>  free_buf:
>   	relay_destroy_buf(buf);
> + 	buf = NULL;
>  free_name:
>   	kfree(tmpname);
>  end:
> 
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ