linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] virtual sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:38:40 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Jan Glauber <jang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	mschwid2@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, efault@....de,
	dmitry.adamushko@...il.com, paulus@...ba.org, anton@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390


* Jan Glauber <jang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> > still, CFS needs time measurement across idle periods as well, for 
> > another purpose: to be able to do precise task statistics for /proc. 
> > (for top, ps, etc.) So it's still true that sched_clock() should 
> > include idle periods too.
> 
> I'm not sure, s390 already has an implemetation for precise accounting 
> in the architecture code, does CFS also improve accounting data?

what kind of precise accounting does s390 have in the architecture code? 
CFS changes task (and load) accounting to be sched_clock() driven in 
essence.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/