[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707200002.50958.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:02:50 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: nigel@...pend2.net
Cc: "Agarwal, Lomesh" <lomesh.agarwal@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: which signal is sent to freeze process?
On Thursday, 19 July 2007 06:59, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thursday 19 July 2007 14:09:56 Agarwal, Lomesh wrote:
> > Can you point me to code where kernel captures process in signal
> > handling and code which runs after suspend to ram is finished?
>
> Sure.
>
> It's in kernel/signal.c (get_signal_to_deliver) for x86 and x86_64, and
> arch/<name>/kernel/signal.c for other arches. The support for other arches is
> the place x86 & x86_64 used to use - I wonder if they should be going away
> (Rafael cc'd to raise this point with him).
That's a good question. :-) I'll have a look.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists