[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A01FA4327@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:54:51 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>, "Arthur Jones" <arthur.jones@...gic.com>
Cc: "Vasily Tarasov" <vtaras@...nvz.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Jan Kara" <jack@....cz>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: build fix for x86_64...
> Looks good.
Looks good to me too (I'm to blame for the version posted by Doug
that only fixed ia64 ... I didn't take the time to check whether
there was a CONFIG_COMPAT option for x86_64 ... oops).
> Tony, perhaps it would make sense to define some common CONFIG
> for COMPAT_FOR_U64_ALIGNMENT longer term to make the #ifs for this
> case a little less ugly.
Certainly if there is ever a third architecture that needs this the
#if mess will be beyond bad. But with only the two of us we'd trade
one ugly #ifdef line here for another half-dozen lines in each of
our Kconfig files to define the new term. I'm not sure whether that
is a win.
-Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists