linux-kernel - Re: build fix for x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200707201032.47545.ak@novell.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:32:47 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ell.com>
To:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:	"Arthur Jones" <arthur.jones@...gic.com>,
	"Vasily Tarasov" <vtaras@...nvz.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Jan Kara" <jack@....cz>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: build fix for x86_64...

On Friday 20 July 2007 01:54:51 Luck, Tony wrote:
 
> > Tony, perhaps it would make sense to define some common CONFIG
> > for COMPAT_FOR_U64_ALIGNMENT longer term to make the #ifs for this
> > case a little less ugly.
> 
> Certainly if there is ever a third architecture that needs this the
> #if mess will be beyond bad.  But with only the two of us we'd trade
> one ugly #ifdef line here for another half-dozen lines in each of
> our Kconfig files to define the new term. 

Half dozens? 

config COMPAT_FOR_U64_ALIGNMENT
	bool
	default y

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/