linux-kernel - Re: build fix for x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070720085501.82715036.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:55:01 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ell.com>
Cc:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"Arthur Jones" <arthur.jones@...gic.com>,
	"Vasily Tarasov" <vtaras@...nvz.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Jan Kara" <jack@....cz>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: build fix for x86_64...

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:32:47 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote:

> On Friday 20 July 2007 01:54:51 Luck, Tony wrote:
>  
> > > Tony, perhaps it would make sense to define some common CONFIG
> > > for COMPAT_FOR_U64_ALIGNMENT longer term to make the #ifs for this
> > > case a little less ugly.
> > 
> > Certainly if there is ever a third architecture that needs this the
> > #if mess will be beyond bad.  But with only the two of us we'd trade
> > one ugly #ifdef line here for another half-dozen lines in each of
> > our Kconfig files to define the new term. 
> 
> Half dozens? 
> 
> config COMPAT_FOR_U64_ALIGNMENT
> 	bool
> 	default y

or even
	def_bool y


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/