[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a781481a0707200341o21381742rdb15e6a9dc770d27@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:11:38 +0530
From: "Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
To: "clameter@....com" <clameter@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] CONFIG_STABLE: Define it
[ Just cleaning up my inbox, and stumbled across this thread ... ]
On 5/31/07, clameter@....com <clameter@....com> wrote:
> Introduce CONFIG_STABLE to control checks only useful for development.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
> [...]
> menu "General setup"
>
> +config STABLE
> + bool "Stable kernel"
> + help
> + If the kernel is configured to be a stable kernel then various
> + checks that are only of interest to kernel development will be
> + omitted.
> +
"A programmer who uses assertions during testing and turns them off
during production is like a sailor who wears a life vest while drilling
on shore and takes it off at sea."
- Tony Hoare
Probably you meant to turn off debug _output_ (and not _checks_)
with this config option? But we already have CONFIG_FOO_DEBUG_BAR
for those situations ...
Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists