linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46A00752.4040103@sgi.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:52:34 +1000
From:	Timothy Shimmin <tes@....com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Tim Shimmin wrote:
>> Please pull from the for-linus branch:
>>     git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
> 
> Ok, this got some conflicts with Nick's VM fault patches, but I fixed them 
> up since they looked trivial, and pushed out the result. Please do verify 
> that it all works and makes sense, though...
> 
> 		Linus

Okay, sorry and thanks.

The window between pulling in and applying changes was obviously
large enough for Nick's changes to get in.
I did pull in, and then had hassles in converting changes between
sgi dev tree and git mainline. Then by the time they were fixed, scripts
updated, had dinner, tree built, had failure with posix_test_lock (fixed that -
then noticed others fixed it - wish I had pulled in at this stage:)
and ran thru some qa, Nick's changes must have gone in.
Ok, next time must remember to repull in latest just before sending out
as a final check.

--Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/