[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707191811550.27249@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@....com>
cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Timothy Shimmin wrote:
>
> The window between pulling in and applying changes was obviously
> large enough for Nick's changes to get in.
Don't worry.
Basically, merging is my job, and I happily do it. If I hit something that
makes me nervous enough, I'll just push back and say "please merge this
for me", but if I merge up conflicts on my own, I generally just let
people know that I did it - not because it's a *problem*, but as a
heads-up to let people know that they should double-check the end result.
Quite frankly, real merge conflicts happen rarely enough that it really
isn't a problem. And 99% of the time, the conflicts are really pretty damn
obvious, and doing them isn't a problem at all. So even when I ask people
to "please check", most of the time I expect that the end result is fine.
So my "please double-check" was in no way meant to be a criticism or a
"please do this better next time". It was _literally_ just meant to be
just that and nothing more: a "please double-check", especially since for
something like XFS, I'm not actually doing any testing personally.
So no worries.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists