[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46A0E76B.5050606@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:48:43 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
CC: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>,
"clameter@....com" <clameter@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] CONFIG_STABLE: Define it
Chris Snook wrote:
> There are many different ways you can use it. If I'm writing a configurable
> feature, I could make it depend on !CONFIG_STABLE, or I could ifdef my code out
> if CONFIG_STABLE is set, unless a more granular option is also set. The
> maintainer of the code that uses the config option has a lot of flexibility,
In other words, nobody will ever know what this config option really does.
> at least until we start enforcing standards.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=== =-=--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists